Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492451›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Experiences of healthcare services among racial and ethnic groups in the U.S.

Sofia Bonsignore, Hillary Samples, Elizabeth M Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sofia BonsignoreDepartment of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Hillary SamplesDepartment of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Elizabeth M StoneRutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, 112 Paterson St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine differences in healthcare experiences by race and ethnicity in the U.S. Methods: Using pooled 2021 and 2023 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data, we assessed differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems measures between race and ethnicity groups (White, Hispanic, Black, Asian, American Indiana/Alaska Native, and multiple race/ethnicities) with linear and logistic regression. Differences by income and education across race/ethnicity groups were examined in regression analyses stratified by race/ethnicity groups. Results: Asian adults reported lower overall ratings of services compared to White adults (coefficient = -0.31, 95 % confidence interval: -0.46, -0.17 on a scale from 0 [worst] to 10 [best care]). Compared to White adults, Hispanic, Black, and Asian adults were less likely to report accessing timely care or understanding provider communications. Income and education had the most consistent positive effects for White adults, but effects were greater in magnitude for Hispanic and Black adults. Conclusions: This study identifies significant differences in experiences of healthcare services in the U.S. across racial and ethnic groups, particularly related to accessing timely care and clear communication with providers. These findings highlight the role of structural inequities as a driver of healthcare disparities among minoritized populations in the U.S.

Indexed as

Healthcare experiencesHealthcare servicesQuality of careRacial disparitiesSocial determinates of health

Identifiers

PMID41492451
PMCPMC12765083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.