ArticleMethodsX2026
Application of a thermoelectric cooling approach for localized hypothermia in a murine model.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving localized and adjustable hypothermia is critical for various clinical and experimental applications, including reducing oxidative stress, modulating inflammatory responses, and enabling temperature-triggered drug delivery. However, existing cooling techniques such as ice packs, and cryogenic sprays limitations in precision, efficiency, duration, and cooling capacity. In this study, we used a commercially available thermoelectric cooling module to construct a simple and low-cost cooling system, and applied it in a preclinical mouse model to achieve focal hypothermia at a subcutaneous transplant site.•The system, assembled using a TES1-4903 thermoelectric module, a heat sink, and a power supply, achieved rapid temperature reduction rates. At 5 V, the subcutaneous temperature decreased at an average rate of ∼1.5 °C/s during the first 10 s, reaching a stable temperature of ∼8 °C within 120 s. At 2 V, the average rate was ∼0.4 °C/s, stabilizing at ∼17 °C over the same period.•The system demonstrated precise temperature control with minimal variability, maintaining temperature steps of <2 °C and ensuring a stable temperature range.•Compared to literature, our system highlights the utility of thermoelectric modules for biomedical cooling applications, demonstrating faster and safer subcutaneous hypothermia with more precise temperature control than other approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.