ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
The Role of Beef for the Lowest Cost and Adequate Provision of Bioavailable Nutrients in Modeled Diets at a Population Level in the United States.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Selenium: Effects on Semolina and Pasta Nutrient Accumulation and Yield.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- The beef terroir: moving from a commodity and its role in human evolution to a new paradigm of health, epigenetics, and sustainability: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assumptions that animal-sourced food production is environmentally unsustainable and animal-sourced foods can be seamlessly replaced as a nutrient source by plant-based foods, seldom consider the higher quantity and greater bioavailability of essential nutrients that are naturally present in animal-sourced foods. Objectives: With beef being a natural food source rich in higher quality protein and bioavailable vitamins, iron, and zinc, the inclusion levels of beef in dietary patterns that meet nutrient requirements at the lowest cost were determined. Methods: Dietary optimization models using linear programming (LP) were developed to formulate cost-minimized nutrient adequate diets at a population level in the United States. The LP diet models used food compositional data from the USDA, published bioavailability estimates for protein, vitamins, iron, and zinc applied to their contents in foods, daily energy and nutrient requirements for different United States population groups, and food prices from the Thrifty Food Plan 2021 Supplementary datafiles. Results: Lowest-cost nutrient adequate dietary formulations (total nutrient diets) included both animal-sourced foods (beef liver, milk, eggs, and fish) and plant-based foods, at a daily diet cost ranging from United States $0.73 to United States $1.23. When nutrient contents in foods were given in bioavailable units, rather than total dietary amounts, daily diet cost was higher, ranging from United States $1.75 to United States $7.80, and more animal-derived foods (beef meat, beef liver, milk, eggs, sausages, fish, and clams) were included in the modeled lowest-cost diets (bioavailable nutrient diets). Specifically, beef meat in the bioavailable nutrient diets was the lowest cost main contributor to bioavailable protein, bioavailable vitamin B-12, calcium, phosphorus, selenium, and bioavailable zinc. Conclusions: Animal-sourced foods, particularly beef meat, were favorably included in adequately nutritious mixed diets formulated at the lowest retail dietary cost for the United States population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.