ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Managing Lumbar Radiculopathy in Super Elderly Patients.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Frequent neurosurgically treatable diseases in geriatric patients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The rising global population aged over 80 has increased the incidence of degenerative spinal conditions causing lumbar radiculopathy. Minimally invasive treatments such as transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) are commonly used, yet their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of TESI and PTED in patients aged 80 and above. Patients and Methods : A retrospective analysis was conducted on 74 patients with conservative treatment-resistant lumbar radiculopathy. Patients were divided into TESI (n=40) and PTED (n=34) groups. Primary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale scores for back and leg pain (VAS-BP, VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Secondary outcomes were operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, hospital stay, and complications. Assessments occurred preoperatively and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and chi-square tests. Results: Both groups showed significant short-term improvement. At 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the PTED group demonstrated superior and sustained outcomes, with greater pain reduction (VAS-BP, VAS-LP), better functional improvement (ODI), and higher excellent/good MacNab rates (87.9% vs 64.9%, p<0.05) compared to TESI. The TESI group had a higher recurrence rate (21.62% vs 6.06%). TESI was associated with shorter procedure times and hospital stays. No serious complications occurred in either group. Conclusion: Both TESI and PTED are effective minimally invasive treatments for lumbar radiculopathy in very elderly patients. TESI offers quicker procedures and rapid symptom relief, while PTED provides more durable pain reduction and functional improvement. Treatment plans should be tailored to each individual, in accordance with established geriatric care principles that emphasize the consideration of comorbid conditions, specific pathology, and patient preferences. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.