ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025
The possibilities of conscious experience in light of the dual origin hypothesis of the neocortex.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical Type: The Basis for a Modern Neurodevelopmental Synthesis (Ontogeny, Phylogeny, Synaptic Connectivity) of the Human Cerebral Cortex.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Review
- From hidden springs to endless oceans: exploring the complementary roles of the amygdala and hippocampus in phenomenal experience.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to contemporary psycho- and physiological perspectives, the brain supports our experience of the world by constantly anticipating what may happen next. In this context, limbic mesocortical areas have been proposed to play a key domain-general role in cortical processing, holding highly abstract content that may be efficiently broadcasted to virtually the whole brain, ultimately integrating interoception into a unified field of experience from the point of view of someone who has a body. Here we ground the evolutionary basis of such structural and functional organization in the hypothesis of the dual origin of the neocortex, suggesting that the addition of phylogenetically newer cortical types with modality-specific processing may have enabled the primitive polysensory role of limbic mesocortical areas to evolve into a multimodal coordinator within an ever more complex brain, favoring the possibilities of conscious experience. Moreover, two fundamental functional axes with relevance for allostasis emerge: (i) a navigation/spatial versus exchange/contact axis; and (ii) a sensing versus acting axis. The former summarizes a fundamental distinction between spatial navigation and musculoskeletal control versus close interactions in the intimate and internal spheres; the latter reflects a functional (although intimately linked) distinction between sensory and motor aspects. These axes define a conceptual bidimensional space across cortical types where virtually all cortical areas may be placed according to their functional relevance, with limbic mesocortices ultimately integrating experience across sensory-motor function and navigation-exchange. These notions have important implications for our understanding of allostasis and human experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.