ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2026
Time-limited trials for acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older patients: rationale, communication strategies, and future research.
Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewProvide an overview of the rationale for implementing time-limited dialysis trials (TLT-Ds) in critically ill older adults with acute kidney injury treated with dialysis, the communication strategies required for proper implementation, and future research directions. RECENT
findingsAKI-D is linked to high mortality, reduced renal recovery, and a substantial chance of discharge to nursing homes in older adults. Many older people value independence and quality of life over longevity. Yet acute dialysis often remains the reflexive treatment option, while patients and families face prognostic uncertainty in the face of mortality. A TLT-D is an ethically sound, person-centered approach that aligns with many patients' preferences. Its benefits include providing a structured opportunity for clinicians, families, and patients to assess the biomedical efficacy of dialysis while allowing time for deliberation, prognostic clarity, and emotional processing. This can inform whether to continue acute dialysis or transition to comfort care or chronic dialysis within prespecified or evolving goals. SUMMARY: Acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older adults needs improvement. Reflexive initiation followed by automatic transition to chronic dialysis may not align with many patients' goals. TLT-Ds can promote goal-concordant care. Further research is needed to guide their implementation and evaluate person-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.