Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492212›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2026

Divergence in μ and δ opioid receptor pharmacology in neurons and antinociceptive efficacy in neuropathic pain: Insights from MP135 and CYM51010.

Perrine Inquimbert, Chantal Fitterer, Sylvain Hugel, Mila Jesic, Yannick Goumon, Virgine Andry, Severine Schneider, Francois Daubeuf, Abdelfattah Faouzi, Stephane Doridot and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Perrine InquimbertCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Chantal FittererCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Sylvain HugelCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mila JesicCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Yannick GoumonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-3437
Virgine AndryCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Severine SchneiderLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Francois DaubeufCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Plateforme de chimie biologique Intégrative de Strasbourg, ESBS, Illkirch, France.
Abdelfattah FaouziCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy at St Louis and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stephane DoridotCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Chronobiotron UAR 3415, Strasbourg, France.
Susruta MajumdarCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy at St Louis and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-3823
Frederic BihelLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Martine SchmittLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Dominique MassotteCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives UPR 3212, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-1009

Funding

Efficacy and signaling modulation by targeting the sodium site at mu opioid receptorR01DA059978 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susruta Majumdar · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Agence Nationale de la Recherche SFRISTRAT'US Project ANR-20-SFRI-0012Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCoRTecS RBA/SCC/JLA/DHA/N° 2023-464m RBA/SCC/JLA/DHA/CPERFEDERFRC NeurodonFRC Neurodon - Rotary Club-Espoir en TêteFrench National Research Agency ANR-24-INBS-0005 FBI BIOGENGraduate School of Pain EURIDOL of the University of Strasbourg ANR-17-EURE-0022IdEx Unistra ANR-10-IDEX-0002Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute IMSInterdisciplinary Thematic Institute IMS (Strasbourg Institute for drug discovery & development)NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059978NIH HHS RO1DA059978Région Grand EstRégion Grand-EstRotary Club FranceUnistraUniversité de Strasbourg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeOpioids targeting the μ opioid receptor remain largely ineffective in neuropathic pain conditions, emphasizing the need for novel therapeutic strategies. MP135 was reported to reduce thermal nociception in naive animals by activating μ-δ opioid receptor heteromers. In this study, we compared its pharmacological profile and antinociceptive properties in naive and neuropathic conditions to those of the μ-δ biased agonist CYM51010 and the μ opioid agonist morphine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Ligand affinity and activation of the G protein and β-arrestin pathways were determined using opioid receptors in their native environment. The impact of acute administration on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds was evaluated in naive male and female mice. The impact on mechanical threshold and respiratory depression was also evaluated in mice with sciatic nerve injury. Pharmacological selectivity was established using μ or δ opioid receptor knock-out mice. KEY

resultsThe three drugs showed similar binding profile and activation of G protein-dependent pathways. However, only MP135 and CYM51010 activated the β-arrestin pathway. In naive female mice, the drugs induced shorter thermal antinociception together with reduced maximal efficacy for morphine and MP135. In neuropathic conditions, morphine and MP135 were respectively poorly effective or ineffective whereas CYM51010 increased the mechanical threshold. The three drugs induced respiratory depression. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The antinociceptive effect was receptor selective and affected by sex and neuropathic condition. This was unexpected based on the drug ex vivo pharmacological profiles and emphasizes the shortcomings of cell-based approaches to reliably predict behavioural responses.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidNeuralgiaNeuronsReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMorphineAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muG protein‐coupled receptorheteromerinternalizationneuropathic painopioid receptorrespiratory depressionsex differencesignalling

Identifiers

PMID41492212
PMCPMC13000925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.