ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Reimagining Early-Phase Clinical Development in Japan: From Regulatory Obligation to Global Acceleration.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reimagining Early-Phase Clinical Development in Japan: From Regulatory Obligation to Global Acceleration.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japan has faced persistent challenges of "Drug Lag" and "Drug Loss", partly due to the regulatory requirement for Japanese Phase I studies prior to global trial participation. However, recent regulatory reforms have introduced flexibility, creating new opportunities for Japan to strategically contribute to global drug development. This study redefined the value of Japanese Phase I by evaluating three options during the early development phase: the Japanese Phase I waiver, the first-in-human study conducted in Japan, and multifunctional Japanese Phase I studies. We analyzed 12 internal cases of Japanese Phase I waiver consultations and conducted a nationwide survey at early phase clinical trial sites. Our findings highlight Japan's robust clinical trial infrastructure for early phase trials. Japanese clinical trial sites have not only accumulated extensive experience in early phase trials but have also conducted specialized evaluations and enrolled diverse populations (e.g., non-Japanese Asians, Caucasians, and patients). The cycle time analysis showed that trials in Japan could be initiated within globally competitive timelines, often faster than those in the EU. These strengths position Japan as a key location for first-in-human and early phase trials, enabling earlier access to investigational therapies and supporting global development strategies. We propose a flexible, case-by-case approach that leverages Japan's clinical research capabilities. This strategy not only preserves Japan's clinical trial infrastructure but also aligns with national initiatives to strengthen the "Drug-Discovery Ecosystem". By integrating Japan into early phase development, pharmaceutical companies can accelerate global innovation while improving access to Japanese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.