ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2026
Mean Basal Esophagogastric Junction Pressure Is a Better High-resolution Manometry Predictor of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Than Esophagogastric Junction Contractile Integral.
Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is Mean Basal Esophagogastric Junction Pressure a Simpler and More Reliable Marker for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Barrier Function?Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: : Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) is a metric of EGJ barrier function assessed on high-resolution manometry (HRM). However, its clinical utility may be limited by measurement discrepancies and wide variability. Mean basal EGJ pressure (MBEP) is a novel, simple HRM metric assessing barrier function. We compared their performance to predict conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: : Consecutive patients undergoing esophageal function testing for known or suspected GERD were retrospectively evaluated. MBEP and EGJ-CI were manually calculated. Conclusive GERD was defined as acid exposure time > 6% or histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus. Statistical analyses including Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Results: : Two hundred and twenty-six patients (mean age 52.8 ± 14.6 years, 58% males) were included. Applying Lyon 2.0 consensus criteria, 41% had conclusive GERD, 8% had borderline GERD, 8% had reflux hypersensitivity, and 43% had no GERD evidence. Patients with conclusive GERD had significantly lower MBEP compared to those without (11.8 mmHg vs 18.5 mmHg; Conclusions: : MBEP is a simple HRM metric to evaluate anti-reflux barrier function, predicting conclusive GERD and differentiating reflux phenotypes with better performance than EGJ-CI. This metric could serve as a valuable adjunctive tool in GERD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.