ReviewJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026
Integration of electronic health records with automated compounding for parenteral nutrition: A narrative review.
Review in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the Prospective Prescription Review System in Reducing Irrational Prescriptions at a Tertiary Specialty Hospital: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Integration of electronic health records with automated compounding for parenteral nutrition: A narrative review.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of electronic health record systems has transformed healthcare by enhancing workflow efficiency, improving data accessibility, and enhancing patient safety. King Fahad Medical City transitioned from a fragmented, paper-based parenteral nutrition management system to a fully integrated Epic electronic health record system, replacing the standalone Baxter ABACUS software. This review outlines a structured approach to integrating automated compounding devices with Epic, incorporating standardized data exchange protocols, interoperability frameworks, development of parenteral nutrition order sets, barcode-enabled verification, and staff training. The clinical decision support system within Epic optimized parenteral nutrition prescription accuracy through real-time alerts, dose limits, and automated calculations. A dedicated parenteral nutrition navigator tool further simplified access to patient data, supporting informed clinical decision-making. This manuscript focuses on the implementation process rather than outcome evaluation. A qualitative approach, using process mapping, training assessments, and end-user feedback, was employed to guide and monitor the integration progress. System refinement and multidisciplinary collaboration resolved challenges, including barcode recognition failures and coding mismatches. This experience underscores the importance of interoperability, decision support tools, and continuous quality improvement in optimizing parenteral nutrition therapy within electronic health record systems, offering a scalable model for healthcare institutions seeking digital transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.