ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Outcomes After Resection for Multiple Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A National Population-Based Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor multiplicity is a negative prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and the role of surgical resection in multiple iCCA remains unclear. PATIENTS AND
methodsData were extracted from the Swedish quality registry for cancers of the liver and biliary tract, for all patients undergoing surgery for iCCA (2010-2021). Validation was performed with all Swedish hepatobiliary referral centers, including a comparison cohort of patients with liver-only multiple iCCA and nonsurgical therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
resultsOut of 338 patients operated for iCCA, 284 had resectable tumors and 54 (16.0%) unresectable disease at exploration. In the resection and exploration groups, 46 (16.2%) and 11 patients (20.4%), respectively, had multiple lesions. A majority of patients with resection for multiple iCCA had two or three lesions (63.0%), with median OS 27.1 months (95% CI 18.8-35.5), compared with 5.3 months (95% CI 3.8-6.8) for patients with unresectable disease (P < 0.001). For patients with four or more lesions, OS with resection was similar as with unresectable disease (P = 0.922). In multiple iCCA, resection was associated with better performance status (P = 0.007), negative lymph nodes (P = 0.028), and smaller tumors (P = 0.004). With adjustment including these factors, resection was not significantly associated with OS (P = 0.090).
conclusionsResection for multiple iCCA with four or more lesions was not associated with a survival benefit compared with exploration. With selection to surgery for patients with good performance status, smaller tumors and no signs of lymph node metastasis, resection for two or three lesions yielded median OS above 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.