ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026
Decolonising and Diversifying Veterinary Education: Why It Matters and How to Begin.
Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decolonising and Diversifying Veterinary Education: Why It Matters and How to Begin.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decolonisation of veterinary education is an emerging topic in academic discourse. Introduced to the concept during a postgraduate certificate in veterinary education, I was surprised by how little literature or guidance existed on the subject. This article is not written from a place of authority, but from a desire to kindle an important conversation, one that examines how colonial legacies continue to shape veterinary curricula, research practices, and access to the profession itself. Drawing on personal experience, blog posts, and scientific literature, I explore how knowledge hierarchies formed through colonialism continue to privilege Western science while sidelining indigenous and ethnoveterinary practices. From "helicopter research" to the underrepresentation of individuals of colour in the veterinary profession, this article traces how colonial dynamics remain embedded in the educational, research, and professional systems we often consider neutral or progressive. Rather than offering a prescriptive solution, this paper aims to spark curiosity, discussion, and action. It suggests that decolonisation begins with personal and institutional insight and reflection and emphasises that meaningful change requires humility, inclusion, and a willingness to confront discomfort. The goal is not to reject existing knowledge, but to enrich it by integrating perspectives that have long been ignored or undervalued. By opening up this discussion, I hope to contribute to a more honest, inclusive, and forward-thinking vision of veterinary education, one that better serves a diverse global community of practitioners, researchers, and animal owners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.