Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492110›Full record

ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026

Decolonising and Diversifying Veterinary Education: Why It Matters and How to Begin.

Serena Maini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Serena MainiRoyal Veterinary College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-3594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decolonisation of veterinary education is an emerging topic in academic discourse. Introduced to the concept during a postgraduate certificate in veterinary education, I was surprised by how little literature or guidance existed on the subject. This article is not written from a place of authority, but from a desire to kindle an important conversation, one that examines how colonial legacies continue to shape veterinary curricula, research practices, and access to the profession itself. Drawing on personal experience, blog posts, and scientific literature, I explore how knowledge hierarchies formed through colonialism continue to privilege Western science while sidelining indigenous and ethnoveterinary practices. From "helicopter research" to the underrepresentation of individuals of colour in the veterinary profession, this article traces how colonial dynamics remain embedded in the educational, research, and professional systems we often consider neutral or progressive. Rather than offering a prescriptive solution, this paper aims to spark curiosity, discussion, and action. It suggests that decolonisation begins with personal and institutional insight and reflection and emphasises that meaningful change requires humility, inclusion, and a willingness to confront discomfort. The goal is not to reject existing knowledge, but to enrich it by integrating perspectives that have long been ignored or undervalued. By opening up this discussion, I hope to contribute to a more honest, inclusive, and forward-thinking vision of veterinary education, one that better serves a diverse global community of practitioners, researchers, and animal owners.

Indexed as

ColonialismEducation, VeterinaryAnimalsCurriculumHumanscolonialismcommunitycurriculumethnoveterinaryindigenousknowledge

Identifiers

PMID41492110
PMCPMC12770916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.