Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492082›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Tailoring the electrochemical performance of MoO

Murugesan Periyasamy, Manavalan Balachandramohan, Srinivasan Surendhiran, Krishnaveni Selva Ganeshan Jagan, Athinarayanan Balasankar, Tae Hwan Oh, Subramaniyan Ramasundaram, Prathap Somu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Murugesan PeriyasamyDepartment of Physics, Selvam College of Technology, Namakkal, Tamilnadu, 637 003, India.
Manavalan BalachandramohanDepartment of Physics, Erode Arts and Science College (Autonomous), Erode, 638 009, Tamilnadu, India. balamohan2006@gmail.com.
Srinivasan SurendhiranCentre for Nanoscience and Technology, K.S. Rangasamy College of Technology, Namakkal, 637 215, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnaveni Selva Ganeshan JaganDepartment of Physics, Selvam College of Technology, Namakkal, Tamilnadu, 637 003, India.
Athinarayanan BalasankarDepartment of Physics, Gobi Arts & Science College, Gobichettipalayam, Erode, 638 453, Tamilnadu, India.
Tae Hwan OhSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongan, 38541, Korea.
Subramaniyan RamasundaramSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongan, 38541, Korea. ramasundaram79@hotmail.com.
Prathap SomuDepartment of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Faculty of Science, Technology and Architecture (FOST&A), Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Off. Jaipur-Ajmer Expressway, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India. prathap.somu@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transition metal oxides (TMOs) have garnered significant attention as supercapacitor electrode materials, primarily because of their excellent electrical conductivity, enhanced electrochemical properties, and feasibility. However, the application of TMOs is limited by their ongoing Faradaic reactions, which can cause significant structural alterations or even destruction, as well as phase changes (in some cases) during cycling, ultimately degrading their capacitive performance. Thus, coupling with carbonaceous materials is highly recommended to improve the structural stability of TMOs in electrochemical energy storage applications. This study demonstrates anchoring MoO3 over reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and carbon nanotubes to mitigate the structural losses that occur during the electrochemical process. The structural, morphological, and chemical characteristics of the synthesized materials were examined via XRD, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, FE-SEM, EDS, and elemental mapping. BET analysis revealed that MWCNT@MoO3 and rGO@MoO3 had significantly larger surface areas and mesoporous characteristics, with specific surface areas of 43.97 m²/g and 81.14 m²/g, respectively, compared to those of pure MoO3 (17.89 m²/g). Furthermore, the electrochemical performance of the composites was investigated. The rGO@MoO3 nanocomposite electrode is superior to pure MoO3, and the MWCNT@MoO3 electrode has the most significant specific capacitance (490 F/g). After 5000 cycles, the electrode maintained 90.9% of its opening capacitance, indicating remarkable cycling stability. Furthermore, the coin-cell symmetric model of rGO@MoO3 yields an energy density of 36.04 Wh kg− 1 and a power density of 677.2 Wkg-1 at a current density of 1 Ag− 1. The rGO@MoO3 nanocomposite enhances its electrochemical performance due to its high surface area, mesoporous structure, and synergistic interaction between rGO and MoO3.

Indexed as

Carbon nanocompositeHydrothermal synthesisMoO3Supercapacitor applications

Identifiers

PMID41492082
PMCPMC12769756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.