ArticleScientific reports2026
Tailoring the electrochemical performance of MoO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) have garnered significant attention as supercapacitor electrode materials, primarily because of their excellent electrical conductivity, enhanced electrochemical properties, and feasibility. However, the application of TMOs is limited by their ongoing Faradaic reactions, which can cause significant structural alterations or even destruction, as well as phase changes (in some cases) during cycling, ultimately degrading their capacitive performance. Thus, coupling with carbonaceous materials is highly recommended to improve the structural stability of TMOs in electrochemical energy storage applications. This study demonstrates anchoring MoO3 over reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and carbon nanotubes to mitigate the structural losses that occur during the electrochemical process. The structural, morphological, and chemical characteristics of the synthesized materials were examined via XRD, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, FE-SEM, EDS, and elemental mapping. BET analysis revealed that MWCNT@MoO3 and rGO@MoO3 had significantly larger surface areas and mesoporous characteristics, with specific surface areas of 43.97 m²/g and 81.14 m²/g, respectively, compared to those of pure MoO3 (17.89 m²/g). Furthermore, the electrochemical performance of the composites was investigated. The rGO@MoO3 nanocomposite electrode is superior to pure MoO3, and the MWCNT@MoO3 electrode has the most significant specific capacitance (490 F/g). After 5000 cycles, the electrode maintained 90.9% of its opening capacitance, indicating remarkable cycling stability. Furthermore, the coin-cell symmetric model of rGO@MoO3 yields an energy density of 36.04 Wh kg− 1 and a power density of 677.2 Wkg-1 at a current density of 1 Ag− 1. The rGO@MoO3 nanocomposite enhances its electrochemical performance due to its high surface area, mesoporous structure, and synergistic interaction between rGO and MoO3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.