Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492068›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2026

Navigating the duality of Akkermansia muciniphila.

Erica T Grant, Elena Monzel, Mahesh S Desai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Strain-dependent efficacy of pasteurizedFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Red Meat, Plant Protein, and Colitis: Emerging Roles for the Gut Microbiome and Bile Acids.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erica T Grant *Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-4939
Elena Monzel *Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Mahesh S DesaiDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg. mahesh.desai@lih.lu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-2209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Akkermansia muciniphila is a prominent member of the intestinal microbiota that has the unique ability to subsist on the mucin O-glycans that form a protective barrier between the host and the gut microbiome. Numerous studies highlight its positive role in metabolic regulation and mucosal barrier maintenance, leading to propositions that A. muciniphila could be used as a next-generation probiotic. However, other work indicates that the effects of A. muciniphila vary depending on nutrition, host genetics and the interaction with surrounding microbes. Furthermore, strain-specific differences in the ability to modulate intestinal barrier function and antimicrobial resistance profiles remain underexplored. Here, by focusing on potential sources of this variation, we provide a nuanced discussion on the complex role of A. muciniphila in human health. With A. muciniphila as an example, we argue that a microbe's specific environment must be considered to enable critical evaluation of next-generation probiotics.

Indexed as

AkkermansiaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeVerrucomicrobiaAnimalsHumansIntestinal MucosaMucinsPolysaccharidesProbioticsMucinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.