ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Implementing Community-Based Psychosocial Interventions for Adults with Severe Mental Illness in High-Income Countries: A Rapid Scoping Review.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychosocial interventions support functional recovery and social integration for people with severe mental illness (SMI); however, their implementation remains fragmented and inconsistent. This rapid scoping review maps the landscape of psychosocial interventions for adults with SMI in high-income countries, identifying their key components, implementation challenges, and strategies to optimise delivery. Following the Cochrane rapid review guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and CINAHL (January 2009 - May 2024) and conducted manual reference screening. Eligible studies focused on non-pharmacological, community-based interventions. Thematic analysis was used to identify implementation barriers and enablers. Of 8,624 screened records, 464 studies met inclusion criteria, covering 15 intervention types. Cognitive-focused interventions (n = 100) supported employment (n = 86), and behavioural therapies (n = 66) were most studied. Outcomes focused on symptom (n = 179), daily living skills (n = 160), and cognitive states (n = 157). Implementation was often constrained by systemic, organisational, and individual-level barriers. Systemic challenges included fragmented services, stigma, cultural and linguistic barriers, and economic constraints, highlighting the need for integrated care models, policy reforms, and culturally responsive approaches. Organisational challenges such as staff resistance, insufficient training, and resource limitations underscored the importance of leadership, stakeholder engagement, and investment. At the individual level, low motivation, logistical difficulties, trauma histories, and goal misalignment reduced engagement and retention, highlighting the need for flexible, person-centred, trauma-informed approaches, strong social networks, and a balance between structure and adaptability. Selecting, adapting, and funding psychosocial interventions remain complex. This review provides a foundation for future systematic reviews of homogeneous intervention subsets to better inform policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.