Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492025›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Financing Community Mental Health Worker Programs in the United States: Three Paths Forward.

Jacob Meyerson, Mark Shepard, Rick Peter Fritz Wolthusen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob MeyersonHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Mark ShepardHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rick Peter Fritz WolthusenHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. rwolthusen@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States is in need of novel solutions to deliver mental health care, especially in the wake of inadequate community health financing following deinstitutionalization. The community mental health work model, in which lay providers deliver basic mental health care and refer to higher levels of care as needed, is proven internationally and has started to be implemented within the United States. Securing sustainable financing for the expansion of these programs remains a challenge. Here, we discuss three avenues for advancing the funding of United States based community mental health work programs. First, by implementing a volunteer model similar to that which has been done internationally; second, by bolstering pre-existing U.S. healthcare funding mechanisms; third, by pursuing a novel collaborative financing mechanism that is rooted in public good economics.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersCommunity Mental Health ServicesHealthcare FinancingHumansUnited StatesVolunteersCommunity health workInnovationMental healthSustainable financing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.