Trial reportThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation
Effectiveness of a Customized Rehabilitation Program for Adults With Post-Concussion Syndrome-A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Trial report in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePost-concussion syndrome is a challenging condition to assess and triage rehabilitation secondary to the heterogeneity of patients' presentations. The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of a subgroup-informed customized rehabilitation (CR) program in adults with persistent concussion symptoms as compared to the current symptom-based treatment approach.
settingRehabilitation hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
participants40 adults (mean age ± SD, 39.1 ± 13.6 years) with persistent post-concussion symptoms (mean symptom duration ± SD, 5 ± 3.1 months) were recruited from various head injury clinics around the greater Toronto area.
designParticipants underwent a comprehensive standardized clinical exam to subgroup the ostensible symptom generators into autonomic, cervical, or vestibulo-ocular. In a crossover design, participants were randomized to undertake either a CR program for 6 weeks followed by standard care (SC) for 6 weeks (Group A) or SC followed by CR (Group B). The CR program was tailored to the individual based on the findings of the exam. The SC program was reflective of symptom-based rehabilitative recommendations. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ-3 and RPQ-13). Secondary outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and exercise tolerance as assessed via the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test.
resultsParticipants in Group A made a clinically meaningful and statistically significant change to the primary and secondary outcome measures at the 6-week follow-up. These changes were maintained at the 12-week follow-up. Only following the CR program did Group B demonstrate significant and clinically meaningful changes in RPQ scores, as well as significant improvements in the secondary outcome measures.
conclusionsA shift away from symptom-based management to subgroup-informed customized rehabilitation may be key to advancing patient care and improving clinical outcomes for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.