Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491961›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Exploring gait automaticity and prefrontal brain activity during single and dual-task walking in aging and Parkinson's disease.

Alexander Kvist, Daniel S Peterson, Lucian Bezuidenhout, Hanna Johansson, Franziska Albrecht, Urban Ekman, David Moulaee Conradsson, Erika Franzén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander KvistDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. alexander.kvist@ki.se.
Daniel S PetersonCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.
Lucian BezuidenhoutDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna JohanssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Franziska AlbrechtDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Urban EkmanWomen's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Allied Health Professionals, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
David Moulaee ConradssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erika FranzénDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalking while performing a concurrent cognitive task leads to cognitive-motor interference, resulting in slower and more variable gait. This is particularly the case in Parkinson's disease (PD), where dual-task situations exacerbate walking impairments, increasing fall risk and reducing quality of life. Cognitive-motor impairment has been linked to excessive attentional demands due to reduced locomotor automaticity. Neuroimaging studies suggest over-reliance on prefrontal resources potentially reflecting compensatory mechanisms. However, few studies link automaticity, performance, and cognitive capacity to prefrontal activity, particularly in PD. In older adults (OA) and people with PD, this study aims to: (1) describe dual-task effects and prefrontal cortical activity during walking with and without a dual-task, (2) determine the connection between prefrontal cortical activity and step time variability as a measure of gait automaticity, (3) explore associations between prefrontal cortical activity and other measures of gait automaticity and prioritization and (4) investigate executive function as a potential moderator in the compensatory relationship.

methodsData from 44 OA and 37 people with PD walking with and without an auditory Stroop task were analyzed. Gait variables were measured using inertial measurement units, and prefrontal activity was assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Executive function was determined with a trail making test. Data analysis involved linear regression models to explore relationships between prefrontal activity, gait automaticity, and executive function.

resultsMost participants had a cognitive priority trade-off when dual-tasking, and the OA group had more prefrontal activity compared to the PD group during single-task and dual-task walking. For PD there was a significant positive relationship between step time variability and prefrontal activity (β = 0.38, T = 6.26, p < 0.01), while OA had a relationship between age and prefrontal activity (β = 0.53, T = 2.33, p = 0.04). Secondary analyses showed relationships between prefrontal activity and dual-task cost of gait speed (β = 0.25, T = 2.90, p = 0.02) and Stroop response time (β = 0.27, T = 3.10, p = 0.01) in PD, but not in OA. No moderation effects were detected in the relationship between gait automaticity and prefrontal activity.

conclusionsIn PD, loss of gait automaticity is linked to increased prefrontal activity, suggesting compensatory mechanisms. In OA, prefrontal activity during walking seems to be primarily age-related.

Indexed as

AgingGaitParkinson DiseasePrefrontal CortexWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredStroop TestAutomaticityCognitive-motor interferenceDual-taskFNIRSGaitWalking

Identifiers

PMID41491961
PMCPMC12849653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.