Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491953›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district, illubabor zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.

Abadir Abdu, Girma Gudesho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abadir AbduDepartment of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O. Box: - 121, Tepi, Ethiopia. abadirabdu98@gmail.com.
Girma GudeshoDepartment of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O. Box: - 121, Tepi, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional medicine continues to serve as a primary source of healthcare for livestock in Ethiopia. However, ethnoveterinary practices are increasingly at risk due to cultural changes, habitat destruction, deforestation, and the overexploitation of medicinal plants. Documenting this traditional knowledge is essential for both drug discovery and the sustainable management of these resources. To address this, a cross-sectional study was conducted using semi-structured questionnaires by selecting 325 across five Kebeles to document the medicinal plants used in the treatment of livestock ailments in the Bure district.

resultA total of 33 plant species, belonging to 18 families that are used to treat 20 different livestock diseases were documented. The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%). Shrubs accounted for the largest proportion of growth forms (42.4%), followed by herbs (30.3%). Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (57.7%), followed by fruits (11.4%). The majority of remedies were prepared from fresh plant materials (84.6%), with crushing being the predominant preparation method (35%). Oral administration was the most common route of application (67%). The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) was recorded for plants used to treat respiratory diseases (ICF = 0.97), followed by dermatological conditions (ICF = 0.88).

conclusionThe study area hosts a diverse array of medicinal plants, underscoring its importance as a valuable source of ethnoveterinary knowledge. Further research is essential to explore the phytochemical properties, antibacterial activities, modes of administration, and to establish standardized dosages for these medicinal plants.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesLivestockMedicine, African TraditionalPhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesBure districtEthiopiaEthnoveterinary medicineIndigenous knowledgeLivestock diseasesMedicinal plants

Identifiers

PMID41491953
PMCPMC12772031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.