Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491945›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

Prevalence and risk factors of non-fatal occupational injury among male workers in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rahul Rajak, Aparajita Chattopadhyay

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Strengthening Occupational Health and Safety in India.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rahul RajakDepartment of Population and Development, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, 27/D, DD Block, Sector 1, Bidhannagar, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India. rajrahul0906@gmail.com.
Aparajita ChattopadhyayDepartment of Population and Development, International Institute for Population Sciences, 2WX7+JW4, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Opposite Sanjona Chamber, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is estimated that 17% of the world's total non-fatal occupational injuries occur in India, leading to severe injuries and absences from work. Despite its magnitude and seriousness, occupational injury remains a neglected public health concern in the country. This systematic review examines the prevalence of and associated risk factors for non-fatal occupational injuries among male workers in India. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases from 1 November 2023 to 31 December 2023. This review includes studies published between 2000 and 2023. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using appropriate tools, and meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 17. We defined a non-fatal occupational injury that has occurred in the workplace while a worker is performing their duties, resulting in physical injury that temporarily or permanently impairs the worker's ability to perform their job effectively, and restricts the worker from working at least one day after the injury occurred (i.e., absence from work). All the selected articles were systematically reviewed by two researchers, and the contributing factors to non-fatal occupational injuries were extracted from each article. Based on their characteristics, these risk factors were classified into five major categories: (1) socio-demographic factors, (2) behavioral and psychological factors, (3) organizational and work-related behavioral factors, (4) occupation-related factors, and (5) workplace safety and environmental factors.

resultsFifty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. In terms of methodological quality, 16 studies were rated as good quality, while 37 were rated as moderate quality. The pooled prevalence of non-fatal occupational injuries among male workers was 38.45% (95% CI: 29.47 to 47.44). Subgroup analyses indicated statistically significant differences in the prevalence of non-fatal injuries across occupational sites and study quality (p < 0.05). We found that younger age, less work experience, substance use, job dissatisfaction, engagement in unskilled and manual labor, long working hours, less availability, and low or no usage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and lack of occupational health and safety (OHS) knowledge and awareness are strong risk factors for non-fatal injuries. The most frequently reported injury types were wounds/cuts/bleeding, burn/acid burn and fracture or dislocation. The findings also showed that falls from a height or same level and being hit by a falling object are the most common causes of accidents at the workplace. Regarding the injured body parts, eyes, hand fingers, and legs are the most commonly affected body parts involved in non-fatal injuries.

conclusionThe findings indicate that non-fatal occupational injuries are significantly influenced by various risk factors. To reduce their prevalence, it is essential to implement effective safety measures, including the mandatory use of PPE, regular OHS training, and adequate supervision. Employers are also encouraged to adopt preventive and treatment strategies that address controllable factors associated with non-fatal injuries. Furthermore, future research on prevention strategies across and within industries can play a vital role in further reducing the incidence of non-fatal occupational injuries.

trial registrationThe study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD420251102239).

Indexed as

Occupational InjuriesHumansIndiaMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsIndiaMale workersMeta-analysisNon-fatal injuriesOccupational injuries

Identifiers

PMID41491945
PMCPMC12870384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.