Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491932›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026

Analysis of survival prognosis and influencing factors in patients with primary liver cancer after D-TACE: a retrospective cohort study.

Le Zhang, Jinhua Yuan, Shuaiwei Liu, Lingling Zhang, Li-Na Ma, Xialuo, Xiangchun Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Le ZhangDepartment of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China.
Jinhua YuanThe First Clinical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Shuaiwei LiuDepartment of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China.
Lingling ZhangRadiation Catheterization Room of Ningxia Medical University General Hospital, Yinchuan, Ningxiax, China.
Li-Na MaDepartment of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China.
XialuoDepartment of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China. 516723708@qq.com.
Xiangchun DingDepartment of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China. 13619511768@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the standard treatment for moderately advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are significant differences in postoperative survival rates, and the key factors influencing prognosis remain unclear. This article focuses on exploring the prognostic factors that affect the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (D-TACE).

methodsA retrospective cohort study design was adopted. A total of 114 HCC patients who received their first D-TACE treatment at our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 and were followed up (with a follow-up period of 6 to 36 months) were included. Baseline data were collected, and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were plotted. Log-rank test was used for inter-group comparison. Multivariate analysis was conducted using methods such as Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to screen independent prognostic factors.

resultsThe patients were divided into the survival group and the death group based on their survival status after 36 months. We found that there were significant differences in baseline characteristics such as the maximum tumor diameter, portal vein invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, CNLC stage, BCLC stage, ECOG score, liver function classification (Child-pugh score), multiple tumor foci, BMI, and several serum indicators between the survival group (46 cases) and the death group (68 cases) (P < 0.05). The KM survival analysis showed that the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were statistically significant (Log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the maximum tumor diameter of the lesion (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18, P = 0.049) and portal vein invasion (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.09-3.64, P = 0.025), ECOG score (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.05-3.50, P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for PFS. Portal vein invasion (HR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.66-6.26, P < 0.001) and HB (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, P = 0.044), NLR (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.53, P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for OS.

conclusionsThis study found that the maximum diameter of the tumor, invasion of the portal vein, and ECOG score were independent predictors of disease progression in HCC patients after D-TACE surgery. Meanwhile, invasion of the portal vein and HB, NLR were key factors affecting the overall survival of patients. In clinical practice, these indicators should be comprehensively evaluated. For high-risk patients, enhanced follow-up management and active consideration of combined systemic treatment and other comprehensive strategies should be adopted to improve their prognosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCancerHepatocellular carcinomaRisk factorsSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41491932
PMCPMC12870177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.