ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026
Gender differences in Myasthenia Gravis in a neuromuscular reference center in Belgium.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is well known that scientific literature has a significant gender gap, as gender differences were not considered until very recently. Women were often excluded from studies, and even when included, the results are rarely analyzed separately by gender. This study aims to investigate gender-specific differences in patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) by segregating data from our cohort of patients in Antwerp (Belgium).
methodsWe analyzed the data of our previously published cohort of 163 patients with MG visited in the Antwerp University Hospital between 2019 and 2021, segregating the information by gender to observe any significant differences.
resultsThe analysis revealed several notable gender-specific differences. Women experienced a delay in diagnosis of over one year more frequently than men. They also had dysarthria as presenting symptom more often than men. The MGFA scores at maximum severity were higher in women, who also reported more limitations due to the disease and required more treatments to control it. While some differences could be attributed to the younger onset of the disease in women, certain differences were independently influenced by gender.
conclusionsWomen experience more limitations due to MG than men and may face a more severe disease course. These differences should be taken into account when determining follow-up and treatment strategies. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of segregating data by gender in scientific studies to better understand gender-specific differences in disease presentation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.