ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
A reverse hierarchy theory of social perception.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse hierarchy theory began with an important insight from visual learning: training guided by generalities and involving easy discriminations was more efficient than training based on specific, detailed discriminations (Ahissar & Hochstein, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90 (12), 5718-5722, 1993; Nature, 387 (6631), 401-406, 1997). This later developed into a more general theory concerning the flow of neural signals through the anatomical hierarchy (Hochstein & Ahissar, Neuron, 36 (5), 791-804, 2002). In brief, the contents of visual experience are assembled unconsciously on the way up; conscious experience begins from the top and works its way down. Here we apply this framework to social perception, where the conventional view suggests that social learning begins with detailed, observable behavior. Facial expressions, gestures, and gaze direction are registered and used to infer higher-level mental states, including goals, intent, and beliefs. In this review, we consider a reverse flow, with recursive updating. A prediction cycle begins with an assumption about another's mental states, in a given social context, which is used to interpret the observable behavior. Mismatches between predictions and observables contribute to updated hypotheses in a recursive fashion. We show how this framework offers a solution to three paradoxes in social perception research: (1) preserved action imitation in autism, (2) definitional problems of empathy, and (3) coordinating self- and other-attributions in joint task performance. We claim that adopting this framework will improve our understanding of social perception through new studies with readily testable hypotheses and that it will inspire studies with greater ecological validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.