Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491922›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026

A reverse hierarchy theory of social perception.

Veronica Dudarev, James T Enns

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veronica DudarevDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. vdudarev@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-8367
James T EnnsDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-8316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse hierarchy theory began with an important insight from visual learning: training guided by generalities and involving easy discriminations was more efficient than training based on specific, detailed discriminations (Ahissar & Hochstein, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90 (12), 5718-5722, 1993; Nature, 387 (6631), 401-406, 1997). This later developed into a more general theory concerning the flow of neural signals through the anatomical hierarchy (Hochstein & Ahissar, Neuron, 36 (5), 791-804, 2002). In brief, the contents of visual experience are assembled unconsciously on the way up; conscious experience begins from the top and works its way down. Here we apply this framework to social perception, where the conventional view suggests that social learning begins with detailed, observable behavior. Facial expressions, gestures, and gaze direction are registered and used to infer higher-level mental states, including goals, intent, and beliefs. In this review, we consider a reverse flow, with recursive updating. A prediction cycle begins with an assumption about another's mental states, in a given social context, which is used to interpret the observable behavior. Mismatches between predictions and observables contribute to updated hypotheses in a recursive fashion. We show how this framework offers a solution to three paradoxes in social perception research: (1) preserved action imitation in autism, (2) definitional problems of empathy, and (3) coordinating self- and other-attributions in joint task performance. We claim that adopting this framework will improve our understanding of social perception through new studies with readily testable hypotheses and that it will inspire studies with greater ecological validity.

Indexed as

Psychological TheorySocial LearningSocial PerceptionFacial ExpressionHumansAutismEmpathyMentalizingMirroringReverse hierarchy theorySocial perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.