ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Intraoperative real-time display of 3D reconstruction models in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of three-dimensional reconstruction in preoperative planning for partial nephrectomy: A prospective study.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a widely used technique for treating renal tumors. However, accurate identification of tumor locations and precise surgical planning remain challenging, particularly in cases with complex anatomy or tumors in difficult-to-reach areas. This study evaluated the usefulness of intraoperative real-time 3D reconstruction models for RAPN.
methodsWe analyzed the data of 57 patients who underwent RAPN using 3D reconstruction models (3D-R group) and 173 patients who underwent RAPN without these models (control group). The models were generated from the preoperative Computed tomography images and displayed on a monitor in the operating room to plan surgical approaches and guide tumor dissection. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the surgical outcomes between the two groups.
resultsThe use of real-time 3D reconstruction models significantly improved surgical outcomes in the propensity score-matched cohort. The ischemia time was shorter in the 3D-R RAPN group than in the control group (p = 0.019). Significantly fewer overall and major complications were observed in the 3D-R RAPN group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.041, respectively). Additionally, the 3D-R RAPN group achieved the trifecta status at a significantly higher rate than the control group (p = 0.005).
conclusions3D reconstruction models are valuable tools for guiding RAPN, leading to shorter warm ischemia times, fewer complications, and a higher trifecta achievement rate, thereby enhancing the overall quality of care of patients undergoing RAPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.