ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Comprehensive evaluation of the learning curve for submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Third-space endoscopy: Current techniques, clinical applications, and future directions.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the learning curve for submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER).
methodsA retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with submucosal tumors (SMTs) treated with STER at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University from January 2018 to October 2024. The surgeries were performed by three endoscopists in our hospital with no prior STER experience. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) curves were used to analyze lesion diameter, lesion location, operation time, tunnel length, procedure speed, en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications in different phases for each endoscopists.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in age and lesion location among the three endoscopists' cases. Based on the inflection point of the CUSUM curve (16-19 cases), the process can be divided into two phases (phase 1 and phase 2). Each endoscopist showed a significant increase in procedure speed in phase 2 compared to phase 1 [0.21 (IQR: 0.12-0.35) cm
conclusionFor endoscopists inexperienced in STER, approximately 20 cases are required to achieve fundamental proficiency in its operative methods and techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.