ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Machine Learning to Predict Return to Work After Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Prediction of Prolonged Work Disability After Occupational Injury and Disease: Temporal Validation and Sex-Specific Performance.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify and quantify the contribution of various features and their interactions to the prediction of return to work (RTW) following medical rehabilitation due to musculoskeletal disorders, using a machine learning approach.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Rehabilitation Statistics Database (RSD) of the German Pension Insurance. A total of 685,890 individuals who received multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders between January 2018 and December 2021 were included. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was trained on 75% of the sample and tested on the remaining 25%. Model predictions were explained using Shapley values to determine the contributions of individual features and their interactions.
resultsOverall, 65.0% of individuals achieved stable RTW. On the test dataset (threshold 0.5), the model achieved an accuracy of 0.815, precision of 0.830, recall of 0.901, and an AUC-ROC of 0.867. The most important predictors of RTW were days in employment, income, incapacity for work at admission, occupational status, duration of incapacity for work, and age. The model also identified interaction effects, including an interaction between postacute rehabilitation and incapacity for work at admission, and an interaction between age and income.
conclusionThe machine learning model demonstrated good predictive performance for RTW after medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders and confirmed the relevance of established predictors, such as prior employment and incapacity for work. In addition, the analysis identified interactions that are difficult to detect with traditional regression approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.