ArticleScientific reports2026
Characterization and comparative analysis of urinary bacterial microbiome profiling in healthy cats and cats with feline idiopathic cystitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Urogenital Microbiota in Healthy Beagle Puppies: A Longitudinal Comparison with the Dam.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Collaborative Collapse: Bile Acid Dysmetabolism as a Central Pathogenic Driver in Canine and Feline Multi-Systemic Disorders-From Mechanisms to Precision Therapeutics.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, the make up of urinary microbiota and its association with disease has garnered substantial attention. However, the urinary microbiota patterns in healthy cats remain unclear, as do the potential dysbiosis conditions in cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC). We hypothesized that urinary microbiota differ by age and sex in healthy cats, and vary between healthy cats and those with FIC. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analyzed the urinary microbiota of 25 healthy cats and 15 cats with FIC. Our results indicate that the feline urinary microbiota is primarily composed of Proteobacteria. While no significant differences in bacterial abundance were found between sexes in healthy cats, some taxa showed variations by age. Cats with FIC demonstrated microbiota disruption, characterized by an increase in Firmicutes and Bacilli, along with a decrease in Proteobacteria, particularly a reduction in the Pseudomonas genus, compared to healthy cats. These results demonstrate the presence of a bacterial microbiome in the urine of cats and suggest a potential association between altered microbiota and FIC. Multi-omics approaches could provide further insights into the core urobiome and its role in feline urinary tract disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.