ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging-based machine learning prediction model for flight cadets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the realm of civil aviation, the existing methods for selecting and training flight cadets have limitations, such as long evaluation cycles and susceptibility to subjective factors. This study integrated multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, including structural MRI (sMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and functional MRI (fMRI), with machine learning techniques. The aim was to construct prediction models capable of accurately differentiating flight cadets from ground cadets. Data were collected from 39 flight cadets with extensive flight training and 37 ground cadets. Representative features were meticulously extracted from each modality and fused at the feature level. Four machine learning classification algorithms, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest support vector machine and Gaussian naive Bayes were employed for model construction. Rigorous five-fold cross-validation and permutation tests were conducted to ensure model reliability. The results revealed that the multimodal fusion model (sMRI + DTI + fMRI + LR) exhibited the optimal performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.838, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.942, a sensitivity of 0.835, and a specificity of 0.834. Through SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis, features with high contributions to the classification were identified, which were closely associated with advanced cognitive functions, visual processing, and attention allocation. This research not only offers a novel approach for the selection and training evaluation of flight cadets but also demonstrates the potential of multimodal MRI-based machine learning models in exploring the neural mechanisms underlying flight-related skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.