ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Artificial intelligence improved efficiency of the computed tomography program.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecious imaging tools like computed tomography (CT) are high-demand, time-limited resources that must serve both inpatients and outpatients. It is therefore essential to use them efficiently and accurately. We aimed to enhance accuracy, reduce administrative burden, and expedite patient care - while ensuring rigorous clinical oversight through human review of artificial intelligence (AI) outputs, including optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NLP).
methodsAt Tzafon Medical Center, we implemented a hybrid AI workflow consisting of: (1) optical character recognition (OCR) with provider-specific pattern matching for automated extraction of patient and referral data; (2) natural language processing (NLP) via the DigitalOwl service for structured clinical concept extraction (diagnoses, comorbidities, negated findings) with human-in-the-loop validation; (3) a deterministic rule-based engine that matched clinical requirements with scanner availability to recommend CT protocols, schedule appointments, and generate patient preparation instructions.
resultsIntegration of AI-powered document analysis using OCR, NLP, and a statistical decision engine increased annual CT examinations by 20% (from 10,000 to 12,000), saved approximately 10 staff hours per week, reduced patient waiting times by 30%, and improved patient satisfaction by 12%. Complaint rates fell from 5% in 2022 to 1% in 2024. DISCUSSION: AI-assisted workflow integration proved to be a cost-effective and efficient approach that improved safety, reduced staff workload, and enhanced satisfaction for both to patients and medical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.