ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Impact of CT acquisition settings on the stability of radiomic features and the performance of pulmonary nodule classification models.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of clinical variables and CT radiomics features in a nomogram for predicting interstitial lung disease in Sjögren's syndrome.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the stability of radiomic features under different CT acquisition settings and investigate its impact on diagnostic model performance and generalizability. MATERIALS AND
methods198 patients with 1227 pulmonary nodules underwent chest CT scans using varied settings (three slice thicknesses, two reconstruction matrices, six convolution kernels, two transmission methods). 1394 radiomic features were extracted per nodule. Feature stability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC, stable: ICC ≥ 0.8, intermediate stable: 0.4 < ICC < 0.8, unstable: ICC ≤ 0.4). Four diagnostic models (Full-feature, Stable, Unstable, Intermediate stable) were developed using two datasets (lung cancer screening, n = 184; clinical scenarios, n = 1192). In addition, three combination models were constructed for ablation analysis. Model performance and generalizability were assessed via fivefold cross-validation and independent test sets with different CT parameters.
resultsSlice thickness and image transmission methods had the greatest and least impacts on feature stability (7.0% and 83.0% stable features, respectively). In training and validation sets, the Full-feature and Intermediate stable models showed higher AUCs than the Stable and Unstable models (p < 0.05). However, in test sets with varying CT parameters, the Stable model maintained consistent performance (AUC: 0.693-0.728), while the Unstable model exhibited the greatest variability (AUC: 0.523-0.800). Notably, the Full-feature and Intermediate stable models largely predicted nodules as benign, exhibiting limited ability to discriminate malignant cases.
conclusionRadiomic feature stability is significantly affected by CT reconstruction parameters, especially slice thickness. Models based on stable features demonstrate better generalizability across varying CT settings, underscoring the importance of assessing feature stability in radiomic-based diagnostics. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomic feature stability is significantly affected by CT acquisition parameters. Stable radiomic features enhance diagnostic model consistency and reliability across diverse CT settings. Therefore, feature stability analysis and selection of stable features are crucial to enhance model generalizability and stability. KEY POINTS: How do CT settings affect radiomic feature stability and model performance? Feature stability varies with CT parameters, but stable features enhance model generalizability. Stable feature models boost diagnostic reliability and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.