Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491849›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Impact of CT acquisition settings on the stability of radiomic features and the performance of pulmonary nodule classification models.

Qian Zhou, Chengting Lin, Jinyi Jiang, Yuwei Li, Yue Yu, Shiyang Huang, Chaokang Han, Liting Shi, Lei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qian ZhouPostgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Chengting LinDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jinyi JiangPostgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Yuwei LiDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yue YuDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Shiyang HuangDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Chaokang HanThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Liting ShiDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China. shilt@zjcc.org.cn.
Lei ShiPostgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China. shilei@zjcc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-2808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the stability of radiomic features under different CT acquisition settings and investigate its impact on diagnostic model performance and generalizability. MATERIALS AND

methods198 patients with 1227 pulmonary nodules underwent chest CT scans using varied settings (three slice thicknesses, two reconstruction matrices, six convolution kernels, two transmission methods). 1394 radiomic features were extracted per nodule. Feature stability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC, stable: ICC ≥ 0.8, intermediate stable: 0.4 < ICC < 0.8, unstable: ICC ≤ 0.4). Four diagnostic models (Full-feature, Stable, Unstable, Intermediate stable) were developed using two datasets (lung cancer screening, n = 184; clinical scenarios, n = 1192). In addition, three combination models were constructed for ablation analysis. Model performance and generalizability were assessed via fivefold cross-validation and independent test sets with different CT parameters.

resultsSlice thickness and image transmission methods had the greatest and least impacts on feature stability (7.0% and 83.0% stable features, respectively). In training and validation sets, the Full-feature and Intermediate stable models showed higher AUCs than the Stable and Unstable models (p < 0.05). However, in test sets with varying CT parameters, the Stable model maintained consistent performance (AUC: 0.693-0.728), while the Unstable model exhibited the greatest variability (AUC: 0.523-0.800). Notably, the Full-feature and Intermediate stable models largely predicted nodules as benign, exhibiting limited ability to discriminate malignant cases.

conclusionRadiomic feature stability is significantly affected by CT reconstruction parameters, especially slice thickness. Models based on stable features demonstrate better generalizability across varying CT settings, underscoring the importance of assessing feature stability in radiomic-based diagnostics. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomic feature stability is significantly affected by CT acquisition parameters. Stable radiomic features enhance diagnostic model consistency and reliability across diverse CT settings. Therefore, feature stability analysis and selection of stable features are crucial to enhance model generalizability and stability. KEY POINTS: How do CT settings affect radiomic feature stability and model performance? Feature stability varies with CT parameters, but stable features enhance model generalizability. Stable feature models boost diagnostic reliability and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

CT reconstruction parametersImage transmissionModel generalizabilityPulmonary nodule diagnosisRadiomic feature stability

Identifiers

PMID41491849
PMCPMC12770142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.