ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparison of treatment modalities for distal radius fractures in terms of functional outcomes pain management and grip strength.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures in adults and require treatment approaches tailored to fracture characteristics and patient needs. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 6-month Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score across three treatment modalities—closed reduction and short-arm casting, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in PRWE outcomes among the three groups. Secondary objectives included evaluating pain intensity, functional disability, grip strength, and wrist range of motion (ROM). This retrospective comparative study included 60 adults with distal radius fractures treated between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into three equal groups (n = 20 each) based on the treatment method. The primary outcome measure was the PRWE score at the 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH) score, grip strength, and wrist ROM. At 6 months, statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups for all outcome measures (p < 0.001). The volar plate group had lower PRWE scores (19.2 ± 4.8) than the external fixation group (28.4 ± 6.3) and the casting group (38.6 ± 5.2). Similar patterns were observed in qDASH and VAS scores. Differences in PRWE and VAS scores between the volar plate and casting groups exceeded established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Grip strength and ROM values also differed significantly among groups; however, no MCID thresholds were applied for these parameters. Significant differences in 6-month PRWE, qDASH, and VAS scores were observed among the three treatment modalities. The volar plate group achieved the lowest disability and pain scores, followed by external fixation. These findings highlight measurable functional and symptomatic differences at short-term follow-up; however, long-term outcomes should be evaluated in future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.