Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491848›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparison of treatment modalities for distal radius fractures in terms of functional outcomes pain management and grip strength.

Mehmet Akif Köse, Zekeriya Okan Karaduman, Mücahit Çelik, Mustafa Toker, Celal Armagan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet Akif KöseDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duzce University, Konuralp/Duzce, 81620, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-7206
Zekeriya Okan KaradumanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duzce University, Konuralp/Duzce, 81620, Turkey. okankaraduman@duzce.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6719-3666
Mücahit ÇelikDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duzce University, Konuralp/Duzce, 81620, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0187-8525
Mustafa TokerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duzce University, Konuralp/Duzce, 81620, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0697-9497
Celal ArmaganDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duzce University, Konuralp/Duzce, 81620, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4148-0057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures in adults and require treatment approaches tailored to fracture characteristics and patient needs. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 6-month Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score across three treatment modalities—closed reduction and short-arm casting, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in PRWE outcomes among the three groups. Secondary objectives included evaluating pain intensity, functional disability, grip strength, and wrist range of motion (ROM). This retrospective comparative study included 60 adults with distal radius fractures treated between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into three equal groups (n = 20 each) based on the treatment method. The primary outcome measure was the PRWE score at the 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH) score, grip strength, and wrist ROM. At 6 months, statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups for all outcome measures (p < 0.001). The volar plate group had lower PRWE scores (19.2 ± 4.8) than the external fixation group (28.4 ± 6.3) and the casting group (38.6 ± 5.2). Similar patterns were observed in qDASH and VAS scores. Differences in PRWE and VAS scores between the volar plate and casting groups exceeded established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Grip strength and ROM values also differed significantly among groups; however, no MCID thresholds were applied for these parameters. Significant differences in 6-month PRWE, qDASH, and VAS scores were observed among the three treatment modalities. The volar plate group achieved the lowest disability and pain scores, followed by external fixation. These findings highlight measurable functional and symptomatic differences at short-term follow-up; however, long-term outcomes should be evaluated in future prospective studies.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPain ManagementRadius FracturesWrist FracturesAdultAgedBone PlatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClosed reductionDistal radius fracturesExternal fixationFunctional outcomesGrip strengthPRWEVolar plate fixationWrist ROM

Identifiers

PMID41491848
PMCPMC12873394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.