ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of diurnal blood pressure patterns with heart rate variability and retinopathy in patients with essential hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Dipping Blood Pressure and Reduced Heart Rate Deceleration Capacities Are Associated With Malnutrition in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the association of different diurnal blood pressure patterns with heart rate variability (HRV) and hypertensive retinopathy (HR) risk in essential hypertension patients. A total of 181 patients (Jan 2023-Jun 2025) were grouped by nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall rate (SBPF): dipper (n = 57, 10%≤SBPF < 20%), non-dipper (n = 62, 0 ≤ SBPF < 10%), reverse-dipper (n = 62, SBPF < 0%). Ambulatory blood pressure (BP), HRV indices, and HR detection rate were compared. Reverse-dipper had higher nocturnal SBP (nSBP), 24-hour SBP (24hSBP) than the other two groups (all P < 0.05), and higher nocturnal DBP (nDBP) than dipper (P = 0.002). Dipper's HRV indices (SDNN, SDANN, RMSSD, PNN50, LF, HF) were better than non-dipper (P < 0.05); SDNN, SDANN, LF were better than reverse-dipper (all P < 0.001). Reverse-dipper's LF/HF was lower than others (P < 0.05). HR detection rates: 3.5% (dipper), 46.8% (non-dipper), 50.0% (reverse-dipper) (P < 0.001). Multivariable regression: BMI (OR = 1.131) was an independent risk factor; dipper (vs. reverse-dipper, OR = 0.031) was protective (P < 0.05). Reverse-dipper has the highest nocturnal BP load, dipper the most favorable (better autonomic regulation). Ambulatory BP monitoring and BMI control are crucial to reduce target organ damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.