ArticleScientific reports2026
A new approach for the field detection of sleep bruxism based on inertial sensor data and machine learning classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Bruxism Detection: A Technical Pipeline Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracking of nightly oral parafunctional activities, such as grinding and clenching, is useful to monitor sleep bruxism. Although polysomnography remains the gold standard for overnight observations, home-based long-term recordings are wished, to ensure time-distributed data and better patient compliance. Technologies based on inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors allow the production of compact, and easy-to-use sensing instruments. This study aimed to develop a proof of concept using IMUs to capture mandibular motion for sleep bruxism assessment and to evaluate the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in classifying motions. A mobile recording setup was developed, incorporating an IMU equipped with tri-axial accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer. A set of 21 in-vivo recordings from three individuals containing grinding and opening/closing mandibular movements was collected for ML algorithm training. The data was manually labeled and divided into train and test data (80/20). Several models were trained to classify the mandibular motion. Overall, the trained models were capable of correctly classifying up to 96% of the test data. The best results were obtained when data from all three sensors were used simultaneously. The results indicate that IMU sensors are a valuable option to assess mandibular motion for a small-scale wearable device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.