ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast genome in Cannabis sativa L. reveals variations in simple sequence repeats among cultivars.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Advances inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes provides insights into phylogenetic relationships and screening of polymorphic markers in Dimocarpus and related species.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Drought stress inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the psychotropic substances contained in the cannabis plant, its cultivation is restricted in many countries around the world. Identifying specific cannabis genotypes can be of great importance in genetic studies, breeding programs, and particularly cannabis trafficking across borders and forensic casework. Although chloroplast DNA in cannabis holds significant importance in distinguishing genotypes, it has not been comprehensively investigated for SSRs yet. This study aimed to analyze the CP genome of cannabis for its complete cpSSR profile. Bioinformatics and genetic analyses were performed to identify SSRs in six different cpDNA sequences. According to the results, 30-46 SSRs were identified in the entire chloroplast genome of the studied accessions. The most common cpSSRs were mononucleotide repeats, followed by tetra-, tri-, penta-, hexa-, and dinucleotide repeats. Both genotype-based distributions and genomic locations of cpSSR motifs were unveiled. Comparative evaluations revealed the cpSSRs that were shared across all genotypes as well as genotype-specific cpSSRs. Based on the mapping data, the majority of the cpSSRs were distributed in the intergenic regions. Several SSR hotspot regions were identified, and among these, the atpH-atpI and ndhF-rpl32 regions are reported here for the first time as potential genetic markers in Cannabis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.