ArticleTrials2026
Protocol for a review of statistical methods used to estimate risk ratios and risk differences in parallel cluster randomised trials.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCluster randomised trials randomise groups of individuals, such as clinics, schools, or communities, and are used when interventions apply at the group level, when individual-level interventions risk contamination between participants, or to reflect real-world implementation. When outcomes are binary, treatment effects may be expressed as relative measures (such as odds ratios or risk ratios) or absolute measures (such as risk differences). CONSORT guidelines recommend reporting both, but risk ratios and risk differences are often underreported compared to odds ratios. Estimating these measures in cluster trials is more complex than in individually randomised trials, requiring appropriate handling of clustering, convergence issues, and small sample corrections. There is currently little empirical evidence describing which statistical methods are used to estimate these effect measures in published cluster trials.
methodsThis protocol describes the planned methods for a methodological review of published cluster randomised trials. We will use an existing database of 800 trials conducted in low- and middle-income countries. From this, we will identify a subset of trials with a parallel design and a binary primary outcome. Trials reporting a risk ratio or risk difference for the primary outcome will undergo further detailed data extraction. We will summarise the methods used to estimate these effects, including how clustering and small sample sizes were handled, and whether estimates were adjusted for covariates. DISCUSSION: This review will provide the first detailed description of how risk ratios and risk differences are currently estimated and reported in cluster randomised trials. The findings will inform the development of methodological guidance and help identify gaps in reporting and implementation. This is particularly important as interest grows in improving estimand specification and the clarity of statistical analysis plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.