SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Pregnancy Outcomes of Adenomyosis after Treatment with High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.
Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review and meta analysis was conducted to investigate the reproductive outcomes in the patients with adenomyosis after HIFU treatment, aimed to recommend HIFU treatment for those women with adenomyosis who have reproductive demand. Extensive search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. All available studies that evaluated the reproductive outcomes after HIFU for adenomyosis. Systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed on data from 15 studies involving 3730 patients with adenomyosis. Pooled results showed that the pregnancy rate (PR) in women who desired to conceive was 54.6%, the live-birth rate (LBR) based on pregnancy was 75.8%, and the possible prognostic factors were non-perfused volume (NPV%) and type of adenomyosis. This review suggests that HIFU was easier to operate, with less adverse events and noninferior to adenomyomectomy. Patients with higher non-perfused volume (NPV%) and focal or internal adenomyosis had more improvement in reproductive outcomes after HIFU treatment. However, the well-designed, prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to compare the reproductive outcomes in those adenomyosis patients after HIFU in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.