ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
The Bidirectional Relationship between Hope, Prosocial Behavior and Loneliness in Chinese Adolescents.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have identified the protective roles of hope (as a cognitive reaffiliation resource) and prosocial behavior (as a behavioral reaffiliation strategy) against adolescent loneliness. However, the bidirectional relations between these constructs and their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly regarding whether these associations reflect dynamic within-person processes. This longitudinal study recruited a sample of 1214 Chinese adolescents (Mage = 15.46, SD = 0.71; 39.30% girls) and assessed them at three time points over one year. The random intercept cross-lagged panel model showed bidirectional relationships between hope and loneliness, as well as between prosocial behavior and loneliness. Prosocial behavior positively predicted subsequent hope, while the reverse effect was not significant. Additionally, all mediation effects were nonsignificant. Conversely, the supplementary traditional cross-lagged panel model revealed bidirectional relationships among hope, prosocial behavior, and loneliness, along with four mediating pathways and four self-reinforcing loops. These findings demonstrate that the bidirectional relationships between cognitive/behavioral reaffiliation processes and loneliness operate at the within-person level, whereas more complex mediation pathways primarily reflect stable between-person associations. This distinction advances theoretical precision in understanding adolescent loneliness and contributes to prioritizing targets for personalized support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.