ArticleCommunications biology2026
Mapping functional homologies between human and marmoset brain networks using movie-driven ultra-high field fMRI.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Mapping of Functional and Structural Homologies in the Pig and Human Brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturalistic stimuli, such as movies, offer a powerful tool for probing functional brain organization across species. Using movie-driven functional magnetic resonance imaging (md-fMRI), we recorded brain activity in humans and awake marmosets exposed to the same dynamic audiovisual stimulus. We applied tensor independent component analysis (tICA) to identify functional networks in each species, hierarchically cluster them, and examine their within- and between-species temporal correlations to assess functional homologies. We found strong interspecies correspondence in core sensory networks, particularly those involved in visual and auditory processing, suggesting conserved mechanisms for sensory integration. In contrast, networks associated with higher-order cognition, including prefrontal and temporoparietal areas, were observed primarily in humans, highlighting species-specific specializations. These findings demonstrate the value of naturalistic paradigms and data-driven approaches in revealing both shared and divergent brain architectures. By openly sharing our data and pipelines, we aim to advance the marmoset as a model for investigating the evolutionary foundations of brain function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.