ArticleScientific reports2026
Firefly algorithm and DNN for improved contactless heart rate measurement from videos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study significantly improves heart rate analysis by enabling contactless heart measurement through facial video analysis. The system improves feature selection and classification accuracy by utilising a Deep Neural Network architecture with Firefly optimisation, offering a dependable technique for heart rate measurement from facial films. This advancement holds promise for non-invasive and convenient heart rate monitoring in various applications, including healthcare, fitness tracking, and stress management. This study proposes a novel approach integrating Firefly optimization with a Deep Neural Network (DNN) architecture for feature selection and classification tasks. Through comprehensive evaluation against state-of-the-art methodologies, the proposed algorithm demonstrates superior performance across multiple metrics including precision, recall, F-measure, and accuracy. Notably, achieving a precision score of 90.22% and a recall score of 94.46%, the algorithm outperforms existing methodologies, highlighting its efficacy in accurately identifying and classifying instances within the dataset. When compared with recent methods (Li et al., 2023; Kaur, 2022; Su et al., 2023), our method produced up to 2.1% greater precision, 1.5% greater recall, and 2.2% greater F-measure, which indicates a clear advantage for non-contact heart rate classification. Thus, the work grouped the heart rate values into relevant clinically meaningful categories and the performance of classification was measured using classification metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.