Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dark Personality, Empathy, and Prosocial Behavior in Convicted Offenders.

Liliana Hurezan, Andrei C Miu, Andrei Costea, Laura Visu-Petra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liliana HurezanResearch in Individual Differences and Legal Psychology (RIDDLE) Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Republicii, 37, Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania.
Andrei C MiuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Republicii, 37, Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania.
Andrei CosteaCognitive Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Republicii, 37, Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania.
Laura Visu-PetraResearch in Individual Differences and Legal Psychology (RIDDLE) Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Republicii, 37, Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania. laurapetra@psychology.ro.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung IZ11Z0_230823/F-RO-CH-2024-0328Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai AGC35858/28.11.2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex interplay between social cognition (empathy and theory of mind), the dark core of personality, and prosociality in convicted offenders has not been thoroughly explored, yet it is deemed essential for predicting and reducing criminal behavior. We aimed to address this intersection in a sample of convicted offenders (N = 86), using the EmpaToM paradigm. The dark factor of personality was a negative predictor of helping behavior in the EmpaToM, self-reported prosociality, and self-reported empathy. It was also negatively related to EmpaToM empathy, especially its Callousness and Sadism dimensions. However, it was not significantly associated with self-reported or applied theory of mind abilities. The negative effect of the Dark Factor on the EmpaToM intention to help in emotionally negative situations was mediated by decreased empathy measured in the same task. Our results highlight the importance of considering the dark personality core together with social cognition in the development of prosocial behavior and, implicitly, in increasing the effectiveness of specifically targeted rehabilitation interventions. Also, the current findings offer preliminary evidence supporting the external and construct validity of a modified EmpaToM for a prison context.

Indexed as

CriminalsEmpathyPersonalitySocial BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTheory of MindYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41491721
PMCPMC12859014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.