Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491675›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Probiotic Development Strategy Centered on Stability and Regulatory Considerations.

Hye Kim, Md Ariful Haque, Md Abdur Razzak, Min Ji Jang, Sehyeon Song, Seockmo Ku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hye KimDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Md Ariful HaqueDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Md Abdur RazzakDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Min Ji JangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Sehyeon SongDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Seockmo KuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-5073

Funding

IFANCA Food Diversity Innovation ProgramTAMU-Advancing Discovery to Market GrantTAMU-Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture GrantTexas A&M AgriLife Research VFICUSDA Hatch Program 8000-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of probiotic strains has become a major focus in both academic and industrial research, driven by their health benefits and growing consumer demand. However, functional outcomes demonstrated under laboratory conditions often fail to align with the stability and large-scale performance required for industrial applications, creating a major obstacle to commercialization. This gap underscores the need for standardized evaluation frameworks that integrate scientific validation with industrial performance metrics. This review critically examines the probiotic development pipeline, encompassing strain screening, resilience-enhancing strategies, and global regulatory frameworks. Particular attention is given to the effects of production stressors such as heat, oxygen, and digestion on strain viability. Studies reporting up to a 31-fold increase in survival after heat shock and up to a 100-fold improvement through microencapsulation during drying are highlighted to illustrate both the potential and limitations of adaptive strategies. These findings reveal the strong strain specificity and inconsistent reproducibility of current approaches, offering important insights for strategic development. Furthermore, regulatory systems in the United States, European Union, Japan, Korea, and China are compared to emphasize how heterogeneity in classification, safety assessment, and functional substantiation complicates global market entry. This review delves into how harmonized evaluation frameworks and sustained collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory authorities help to develop next-generation probiotics by integrating functionality, safety, stability, industrial application, and regulation parameters to achieve balanced progress in efficacy, safety, scalability, and economic feasibility.

Indexed as

Probioticsmicroencapsulationprobioticsregulatory frameworksstabilitystrain development

Identifiers

PMID41491675
PMCPMC12770815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.