ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2026
Exploring Body-Specific Associations in Swipe Gestures: A Study on Hand Dominance and Emotional Valence.
Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Body-Specific Associations in Swipe Gestures: A Study on Hand Dominance and Emotional Valence.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Body-Specificity Hypothesis suggests that the area around the dominant hand is perceived positively, contrasting with a negative perception around the non-dominant hand. Given the pervasive use of interactive technologies, our study aimed to investigate body-specific associations in real-world settings, examining whether these are modulated by mainstream digital gestures like swiping. N = 30 right-handed participants (Experiment 1) and N = 30 left-handed participants (Experiment 2) were asked to make valence judgements on 28 valence-laden images on a tablet, with each hand in separate sessions, engaging in a congruent task (swipe towards the dominant side-positive, swipe towards the non-dominant side-negative) and an incongruent task (the opposite response pattern). Following the valence judgement task, participants assessed the intensity of their responses using a 9-point Likert scale. Results indicated that right-handers were faster in the congruent condition than in the incongruent condition and showed faster responses when swiping for negative images with the non-dominant hand. Left-handed participants did not show differences in response times but evaluated images as more positive/negative in the congruent condition compared to the incongruent. Overall, these findings support the Body-Specificity Hypothesis and underscore the importance of considering the embodied-cognition-framework as susceptible to the influence of technology use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.