ReviewGenome biology2026
Haplotype applications in genomic selection.
Review in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting genetic architecture and improving machine learning‑based genomic prediction of flowering time in Osmanthus fragrans by integrating structural variants.The plant genome · 2026Article
- CLCNet: a contrastive learning and chromosome-aware network for genomic prediction in plants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an urgent need to increase sustainable crop production. The application of molecular marker technologies such as genomic selection and machine learning based approaches are aiding accelerated crop improvement. Conventional molecular marker technologies use single nucleotide polymorphisms to predict traits, however these do not capture local epistasis and can be challenging for machine learning applications. With the growth of genome sequence data, it is possible to define haplotypes that can account for local epistatic effects and are more suitable for machine learning models. This review discusses the different methods for defining haplotype blocks and their application in plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.