Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491452›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Metaphors in context and in isolation: Familiarity, aptness, concreteness, metaphoricity, and structure norms for 300 two-word expressions.

Laura Pissani, Roberto G de Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura PissaniDepartment of Language Science and Technology, Language Science and Technology, Saarland University, Campus C7 2, Room 3.04, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. laura.pissani@uni-saarland.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-4515
Roberto G de AlmeidaDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familiarity, aptness, concreteness, metaphoricity, and structural norms for 300 two-word English metaphorical expressions (e.g., broken heart, early bird), presented in sentence context and in isolation, were obtained from 164 participants. Familiarity was conceived as the extent to which participants had previously heard or read that expression. Aptness was conceived as the extent to which the vehicle captured important features of the topic. Concreteness was conceived as the extent to which the meaning conveyed by the vehicle could be perceived through the senses or actions. Metaphoricity was conceived as the extent to which the expression was perceived as figuratively rather than literally true. Metaphor constituent structure was conceived as a graded measure indicating whether the metaphorical content is carried by the first word, the second word, or distributed across both words. In addition to these variables, which are known to play a key role in metaphor comprehension, we provide frequency scores for the whole expression as well as for each constituent separately from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) database. Cumulative link mixed-effects models were used to examine the effects of context and vehicle position on participants' ratings, and to assess whether familiarity, aptness, and concreteness predicted perceived metaphoricity. This set of norms, the first of its kind, serves as a resource for research employing a variety of computational, behavioral, and neuroimaging methods to examine the nature of metaphor comprehension and semantic composition.

Indexed as

ComprehensionMetaphorRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMalePsycholinguisticsSemanticsYoung AdultCompositionalityFigurative languageMetaphor normsMetaphorsMetaphors in context

Identifiers

PMID41491452
PMCPMC12769609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.