ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Heated tobacco products vs conventional cigarettes: a scoping review of cardiovascular and respiratory clinical outcomes.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respiratory function, functional capacity, dyspnea, and sleep quality in young adults using the IQOS heated tobacco product: a matched cross-sectional study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this article is to provide an overview of studies in humans that evaluate and compare the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs) with those of conventional cigarette smoking on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. To address this research question, a scoping review methodology was employed.A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant articles published between January 2014 and March 2025. Two reviewers independently screened all articles. This process resulted in the identification of 34 articles deemed appropriate to the aims of this scoping review.Despite the heterogeneity of the available data, the current evidence suggests that HTPs are associated with a lower harmful impact on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems as compared to conventional cigarettes. However, considering the relatively recent introduction of HTPs, in contrast to the long latency periods typically required for the development of smoking-related chronic diseases, as well as the evolving design and composition of these products, it is not surprising that definitive conclusions regarding their clinical, and public health impact bring up the need to be integrated by long-term evidence derived from independently conducted studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.