Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491367›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026

Heated tobacco products vs conventional cigarettes: a scoping review of cardiovascular and respiratory clinical outcomes.

Paola Andreozzi, Marzia Miglionico, Marin Pecani, Giorgio Sesti, Gualberto Gussoni

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paola AndreozziUnit of Predictive, Gender-Specific and Chronic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Marzia MiglionicoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marin PecaniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio SestiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. giorgio.sesti@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1618-7688
Gualberto GussoniRIDE2Med Foundation, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to provide an overview of studies in humans that evaluate and compare the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs) with those of conventional cigarette smoking on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. To address this research question, a scoping review methodology was employed.A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant articles published between January 2014 and March 2025. Two reviewers independently screened all articles. This process resulted in the identification of 34 articles deemed appropriate to the aims of this scoping review.Despite the heterogeneity of the available data, the current evidence suggests that HTPs are associated with a lower harmful impact on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems as compared to conventional cigarettes. However, considering the relatively recent introduction of HTPs, in contrast to the long latency periods typically required for the development of smoking-related chronic diseases, as well as the evolving design and composition of these products, it is not surprising that definitive conclusions regarding their clinical, and public health impact bring up the need to be integrated by long-term evidence derived from independently conducted studies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHot TemperatureRespiratory Tract DiseasesTobacco ProductsHumansConventional cigarettes smokingGlobal public healthHarm reductionHeated tobacco products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.