Observational studyBMC neurology2026
Positional nystagmus in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional case-control study.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOculomotor dysfunction is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet central positional nystagmus (CPN) remains insufficiently characterised. As a manifestation of central vestibular pathway dysfunction, CPN may reflect subtle brainstem or cerebellar involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and characteristics of CPN in MS using videonystagmography (VNG).
methodsIn this observational cross-sectional study, 46 patients with definite MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] ≤ 6.5) and 46 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent standardised positional testing (Dix–Hallpike, Pagnini–McClure, and Yacovino manoeuvres) recorded with VNG. MS patients were stratified by EDSS severity. Positional nystagmus was assessed for occurrence, direction, temporal pattern, canal-plane concordance, latency, and slow-phase velocity. Group differences were analysed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex.
resultsPositional nystagmus was identified in 24/46 MS patients (52%) compared with 5/46 controls (11%). MS patients had significantly higher odds of exhibiting positional nystagmus than controls (odds ratio 9.06, 95% confidence interval 3.22–30.2; p < 0.001). Increased occurrence was observed across all positional manoeuvres. No significant differences were detected across EDSS severity strata, and age and sex were not significant predictors. Compared with controls, positional nystagmus in MS showed greater heterogeneity, higher slow-phase velocity, broader directional patterns, frequent canal-plane non-concordance.
conclusionsCPN was commonly observed in this MS cohort. These findings support the feasibility of VNG-based positional testing in MS and suggest that CPN may reflect subtle infratentorial dysfunction, although its clinical relevance remains uncertain. Longitudinal studies integrating clinical and imaging data are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.