ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Cutaneous Sensory Loss After Lipoabdominoplasty: A Prospective Quantitative Mapping Study with Functional and Quality-of-Life Correlations.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominoplasty, especially when combined with circumferential liposuction, is a widely performed body contouring procedure with well-established aesthetic and functional benefits. However, postoperative cutaneous sensory loss in the abdominal wall remains a frequent and underexplored complication. This study aimed to prospectively map sensory changes following lipoabdominoplasty and evaluate the influence of Scarpa's fascia preservation on recovery trajectories and quality of life.
methodsA prospective single-center study was conducted on 60 patients (mean age 42.7 years; 93.3% female) undergoing 360-degree liposuction and lipoabdominoplasty. Patients were stratified into two groups: Scarpa-preserved (n = 32) and standard dissection with Scarpa removal (n = 28). Sensory testing included Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, thermal discrimination, and two-point discrimination across 12 abdominal dermatomal zones (T6-L1), assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using standardized questionnaires (SF-36, VAS, and POSAS). Statistical comparisons and multivariate regression were performed to identify predictors of long-term sensory deficits.
resultsAt 1 month, 93.3% of patients exhibited sensory impairment, most pronounced in the infraumbilical medial (Zone 8), suprapubic (Zone 11), and supraumbilical midline (Zone 5) regions. Recovery progressed steadily: residual deficits persisted in 72.5% at 3 months, 55.0% at 6 months, and 21.7% at 12 months. Tactile, thermal, and spatial discrimination showed parallel patterns of recovery, with near-complete restitution in most cases. Preservation of Scarpa's fascia significantly improved sensory outcomes, with better tactile thresholds (Zones 5 and 8 at 6 months, p < 0.05), faster thermal recovery (Zone 11 at 3 months, p = 0.041), and fewer impaired dermatomes at late follow-up (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified higher BMI, standard dissection (Scarpa removal), and greater resection weight (>1000 g) as independent predictors of persistent hypoesthesia. Patient-reported maps correlated strongly with objective findings (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). Quality-of-life scores and scar satisfaction were significantly higher in the Scarpa-preserved group at 12 months.
conclusionsCutaneous sensory loss is an almost universal early sequela of lipoabdominoplasty but typically resolves within 12 months. Preservation of Scarpa's fascia confers measurable neuroprotective effects, reducing long-term deficits and enhancing patient satisfaction. Incorporating comprehensive sensory evaluation into surgical planning and patient counseling may improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.