ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Ultrasound-Based Classification of Infraorbital Fat and Groove Patterns: Clinical Implications for Safer Filler Injection.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Infraorbital Fat Protrusion: A Preliminary Case Series.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe infraorbital region is one of the most complex and esthetically critical areas of the face. Age-related changes, such as infraorbital groove and infraorbital fat bulging, frequently coexist and vary significantly among individuals. Although hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection is a common nonsurgical treatment for infraorbital hollows, improper placement, particularly into the infraorbital fat, can result in suboptimal outcomes and complications such as bulging. Clinical evaluation alone is often insufficient to identify anatomical variations beneath the skin. This study aimed to classify infraorbital grooves and fat patterns using ultrasound imaging and to propose practical guidelines that enhance the safety and precision of filler injections in this region.
methodsThirty one patients aged > 40 years underwent ultrasonographic evaluation of the lower eyelid. Based on the relationship among the infraorbital fat, inferior orbital rim, and visible grooves, five anatomical types (A-E) were identified.
resultsEach anatomical type reflects different degrees of infraorbital fat descent and groove depth. In Types D and E, infraorbital fat extends to or beyond the orbital rim, increasing the risk of 1 filler misplacement during deep injections.
conclusionsPre-injection ultrasound evaluation provides critical insights into fat positioning and vascular structures, supporting safer and more individualized injection strategies. The proposed classification offers a clinically useful framework for personalized infraorbital filler treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.