ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Longitudinal MRI-based deep learning model for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A radiomics-deep learning nomogram integrating intratumoral and peritumoral DCE-MRI features for pCR prediction in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is crucial for optimizing breast cancer treatment strategies. Here, we present a novel breast self-supervised temporal learning framework (BSTNet) for predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) using longitudinal MRI. Through self-supervised pre-training, BSTNet aims to achieve model generalization across multi-timepoint and dual-timepoint scenarios while capturing dynamic tumor changes during NAT. In a multicenter cohort of 1339 patients, BSTNet demonstrated robust performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.882 in internal validation (from Center 1), and 0.857 and 0.854 in external validation (Centers 2 and 3, respectively). In all three validation cohorts, subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across molecular subtypes, with AUCs ranging from 0.827 to 0.886 for hormone receptor status and 0.818-0.895 for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The model maintained a stable performance across varying interim MRI timings in the external validation cohorts, with AUCs of 0.841-0.893 in Center 2 and 0.792-0.970 in Center 3. Notably, BSTNet effectively identified patients with non-pCR (specificity: 86.4%, 74.5%, and 85.1% for internal validation, Center 2, and Center 3, respectively). In conclusion, BSTNet provides a robust and generalizable deep learning framework for early pCR prediction. Its ability to effectively interpret variable longitudinal MRI data offers a powerful and practical tool to guide adaptive treatment planning in diverse clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.