ArticleScientific reports2026
Combination of bacteriophage and antibiofilm compounds from phyllosphere bacteria as a comprehensive strategy for aquaculture and food pathogen control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prophage-Derived Molecules as Anti-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilm-forming bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus and Vibrio harveyi are major contributors to food contamination and problems in aquaculture. This study aimed to evaluate the antibiofilm compounds of the phyllosphere bacterial supernatants (Pseudomonas fluorescens JB 3B and Proteus myxofaciens JB 20B), bacteriophages (BC-VP and Vh-S4-phage), and their combinations against these pathogens. Antibacterial and quorum sensing assays showed no activities. The combination of antibiofilm compounds and bacteriophages revealed measurable but species-dependent effects. For B. cereus, the JB 3B-phage and JB 20B-phage combinations revealed inhibition results of 39.21% and 39.62%, and destruction results of 50.60% and 43.12%, respectively. In contrast, V. harveyi showed much lower responses, with inhibition results at 3.49% and 4.80%, and destruction at 9.28% and 6.39%, respectively. SEM analysis supported the microscopic observations, showing reduced biofilm layers and disrupted biofilm matrix structures in treated groups. Gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed potential antibiofilm compounds, including acetic acid, sarcosine, 4-octadecenal, and erythritol. Statistical analysis confirmed significant effects of bacterial species, treatment, and the interaction on both biofilm inhibition and destruction (p < .05). Overall, the study highlights specific phyllosphere-derived compounds and bacteriophages with promising antibiofilm activity, while emphasizing that their combined use may not always enhance efficacy in controlling biofilm-related contamination in aquaculture and food industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.